Gaps and Dummies
เบก.เบ. 2005 ยท Amsterdam University Press
เบเบถเปเบกเบญเบตเบเบธเบ
352
เปเปเบฒ
family_home
เบกเบตเบชเบดเบ
info
reportเบเปเปเปเบเปเบขเบฑเปเบเบขเบทเบเบเบฒเบเบเบฑเบเบญเบฑเบเบเบฑเบ เปเบฅเบฐ เบเบณเบเบดเบเบปเบก เบชเบถเบเบชเบฒเปเบเบตเปเบกเปเบเบตเบก
เบเปเบฝเบงเบเบฑเบเบเบถเปเบก e-book เบเบตเป
In this study the syntactic properties of empty categories and dummy pronouns are investigated within the framework of Government-Binding theory.
The assumption that clauses must have a subject is present in most, if not all, linguistic theories. In GB theory the requirement that clauses have a subject is stipulated as a consequence of the base rules or the Extended Projection Principle. In this book it is claimed that no such stipulation is necessary. The presence of a subject is exclusively determined by the theories of thematic roles and Case.
This view is supported by the fact that the alleged dummy subjects Dutch, i.e. er and het, show a variety of properties, which can only be explained if they are not analyzed as dummy subjects. Further confirmation is derived from the fact that Dutch, subjectless sentences are found in precisely those circumstances in which neither -theory nor Case theory requires a subject to be present.
Chapter 1 presents a theory of empty categories. This theory enables us to explain the distribution of gaps, and makes precise and correct predictions with respect to the occurrence of parasitic gaps.
The non-dummy status of het, discussed in chapter 2, is supported by the fact that it can be the antecedent of PRO, reflexives, and parasitic gaps, and by an asymmetry in wh-movement from sentential complements. The analysis of het leads to a discussion of a variety of constructions, including constructions with raising, ergative, and psychological verbs.
The adverbial pronoun er displays several distinct syntactic functions. In chapter 3 it is argued that none of these different functions justifies an analysis of er as a dummy subject.
In chapter 4 some of the consequences of the theory introduced in the preceding chapters are investigated. These include a discussion of the status of the subject position in languages such as English, Italian, French, and Spanish, the structure of Old English, and the status of dummy pronouns in German and English.
The assumption that clauses must have a subject is present in most, if not all, linguistic theories. In GB theory the requirement that clauses have a subject is stipulated as a consequence of the base rules or the Extended Projection Principle. In this book it is claimed that no such stipulation is necessary. The presence of a subject is exclusively determined by the theories of thematic roles and Case.
This view is supported by the fact that the alleged dummy subjects Dutch, i.e. er and het, show a variety of properties, which can only be explained if they are not analyzed as dummy subjects. Further confirmation is derived from the fact that Dutch, subjectless sentences are found in precisely those circumstances in which neither -theory nor Case theory requires a subject to be present.
Chapter 1 presents a theory of empty categories. This theory enables us to explain the distribution of gaps, and makes precise and correct predictions with respect to the occurrence of parasitic gaps.
The non-dummy status of het, discussed in chapter 2, is supported by the fact that it can be the antecedent of PRO, reflexives, and parasitic gaps, and by an asymmetry in wh-movement from sentential complements. The analysis of het leads to a discussion of a variety of constructions, including constructions with raising, ergative, and psychological verbs.
The adverbial pronoun er displays several distinct syntactic functions. In chapter 3 it is argued that none of these different functions justifies an analysis of er as a dummy subject.
In chapter 4 some of the consequences of the theory introduced in the preceding chapters are investigated. These include a discussion of the status of the subject position in languages such as English, Italian, French, and Spanish, the structure of Old English, and the status of dummy pronouns in German and English.
เบเปเบฝเบงเบเบฑเบเบเบนเปเบเบฝเบ
Hans Bennis is professor of linguistics at the University of Amsterdam and director of the Meertens Institute (Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) in Amsterdam. The Meertens Institute concentrates on documentation and research of Dutch popular culture and language variation. His research is mainly directed towards the syntax of Dutch within the framework of generative grammar. In recent years, his attention has shifted in the direction of syntactic microvariation within the Dutch language area. He is coordinator and co-author of the Syntactic Atlas of the Dutch Dialects (SAND), the first volume of which has appeared with Amsterdam University Press in 2005.
เปเบซเปเบเบฐเปเบเบ e-book เบเบตเป
เบเบญเบเบเบงเบเปเบฎเบปเบฒเบงเปเบฒเบเปเบฒเบเบเบดเบเปเบเบงเปเบ.
เบญเปเบฒเบโเบเปเปโเบกเบนเบโเบเปเบฒเบงโเบชเบฒเบ
เบชเบฐเบกเบฒเบเปเบเบ เปเบฅเบฐ เปเบเบฑเบเปเบฅเบฑเบ
เบเบดเบเบเบฑเปเบ เปเบญเบฑเบ Google Play Books เบชเบณเบฅเบฑเบ Android เปเบฅเบฐ iPad/iPhone. เบกเบฑเบเบเบดเปเบเบเปเปเบกเบนเบเปเบเบเบญเบฑเบเบเบฐเปเบเบกเบฑเบเบเบฑเบเบเบฑเบเบเบตเบเบญเบเบเปเบฒเบ เปเบฅเบฐ เบญเบฐเบเบธเบเบฒเบเปเบซเปเบเปเบฒเบเบญเปเบฒเบเบเบฒเบเบญเบญเบเบฅเบฒเบ เบซเบผเบท เปเบเบเบญเบญเบเบฅเบฒเบเปเบเป เบเปเปเบงเปเบฒเบเปเบฒเบเบเบฐเบขเบนเปเปเบช.
เปเบฅเบฑเบเบเบฑเบญเบ เปเบฅเบฐ เบเบญเบกเบเบดเบงเปเบเบต
เบเปเบฒเบเบชเบฒเบกเบฒเบเบเบฑเบเบเบถเปเบกเบชเบฝเบเบเบตเปเบเบทเปเปเบ Google Play เปเบเบเปเบเปเปเบเบฃเปเบเบฃเบกเบเปเบญเบเปเบงเบฑเบเบเบญเบเบเบญเบกเบเบดเบงเปเบเบตเบเบญเบเบเปเบฒเบเปเบเป.
eReaders เปเบฅเบฐเบญเบธเบเบฐเบเบญเบเบญเบทเปเบเป
เปเบเบทเปเบญเบญเปเบฒเบเปเบเบญเบธเบเบฐเบเบญเบ e-ink เปเบเบฑเปเบ: Kobo eReader, เบเปเบฒเบเบเบณเปเบเบฑเบเบเปเบญเบเบเบฒเบงเปเบซเบผเบเปเบเบฅเป เปเบฅเบฐ เปเบญเบเบเปเบฒเบเบกเบฑเบเปเบเปเบชเปเบญเบธเบเบฐเบเบญเบเบเบญเบเบเปเบฒเบเบเปเบญเบ. เบเบฐเบเบดเบเบฑเบเบเบฒเบกเบเบณเปเบเบฐเบเบณเบฅเบฐเบญเบฝเบเบเบญเบ เบชเบนเบเบเปเบงเบเปเบซเบผเบทเบญ เปเบเบทเปเบญเปเบญเบเบเปเบฒเบเปเบเบฅเปเปเปเบชเป eReader เบเบตเปเบฎเบญเบเบฎเบฑเบ.
