Descartes's Changing Mind
āĻā§āĻ˛āĻžāĻ ā§¨ā§Ļā§Ļā§¯ ¡ Princeton University Press
āĻāĻŦā§āĻ
272
āĻĒā§āĻˇā§āĻ āĻž
family_home
āĻ¯ā§āĻā§āĻ¯
info
reportāĻŽā§āĻ˛ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻāĻāĻ¨ āĻā§°ā§ āĻĒā§°ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻ˛ā§āĻāĻ¨āĻž āĻ¸āĻ¤ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻĒāĻ¨ āĻā§°āĻž āĻšā§ā§ąāĻž āĻ¨āĻžāĻ  āĻ
āĻ§āĻŋāĻ āĻāĻžāĻ¨āĻ
āĻāĻ āĻāĻŦā§āĻāĻāĻ¨ā§° āĻŦāĻŋāĻˇā§ā§
Descartes's works are often treated as a unified, unchanging whole. But in Descartes's Changing Mind, Peter Machamer and J. E. McGuire argue that the philosopher's views, particularly in natural philosophy, actually change radically between his early and later works--and that any interpretation of Descartes must take account of these changes. The first comprehensive study of the most significant of these shifts, this book also provides a new picture of the development of Cartesian science, epistemology, and metaphysics.
No changes in Descartes's thought are more significant than those that occur between the major works The World (1633) and Principles of Philosophy (1644). Often seen as two versions of the same natural philosophy, these works are in fact profoundly different, containing distinct conceptions of causality and epistemology. Machamer and McGuire trace the implications of these changes and others that follow from them, including Descartes's rejection of the method of abstraction as a means of acquiring knowledge, his insistence on the infinitude of God's power, and his claim that human knowledge is limited to that which enables us to grasp the workings of the world and develop scientific theories.
No changes in Descartes's thought are more significant than those that occur between the major works The World (1633) and Principles of Philosophy (1644). Often seen as two versions of the same natural philosophy, these works are in fact profoundly different, containing distinct conceptions of causality and epistemology. Machamer and McGuire trace the implications of these changes and others that follow from them, including Descartes's rejection of the method of abstraction as a means of acquiring knowledge, his insistence on the infinitude of God's power, and his claim that human knowledge is limited to that which enables us to grasp the workings of the world and develop scientific theories.
āĻ˛āĻŋāĻāĻā§° āĻŦāĻŋāĻˇāĻ¯āĻŧā§
Peter Machamer is professor of history and philosophy of science and associate director of the Center for Philosophy of Science at the University of Pittsburgh. J. E. McGuire is professor of history and philosophy of science at the University of Pittsburgh, and a resident fellow of the Center for Philosophy of Science.
āĻāĻ āĻāĻŦā§āĻāĻāĻ¨āĻ āĻŽā§āĻ˛ā§āĻ¯āĻžāĻāĻāĻ¨ āĻā§°āĻ
āĻāĻŽāĻžāĻ āĻāĻĒā§āĻ¨āĻžā§° āĻŽāĻ¤āĻžāĻŽāĻ¤ āĻāĻ¨āĻžāĻāĻāĨ¤
āĻĒāĻĸāĻŧāĻžā§° āĻ¨āĻŋāĻ°ā§āĻĻā§āĻļāĻžā§ąāĻ˛ā§
āĻ¸ā§āĻŽāĻžā§°ā§āĻāĻĢâāĻ¨ āĻā§°ā§ āĻā§āĻŦāĻ˛ā§āĻ
Android āĻā§°ā§ iPad/iPhoneā§° āĻŦāĻžāĻŦā§ Google Play Books āĻāĻĒāĻā§ āĻāĻ¨āĻˇā§āĻāĻ˛ āĻā§°āĻāĨ¤ āĻ āĻ¸ā§āĻŦāĻ¯āĻŧāĻāĻā§āĻ°āĻŋāĻ¯āĻŧāĻāĻžā§ąā§ āĻāĻĒā§āĻ¨āĻžā§° āĻāĻāĻžāĻāĻŖā§āĻā§° āĻ¸ā§āĻ¤ā§ āĻāĻŋāĻāĻ āĻšāĻ¯āĻŧ āĻā§°ā§ āĻāĻĒā§āĻ¨āĻŋ āĻ¯'āĻ¤ā§ āĻ¨āĻžāĻĨāĻžāĻāĻ āĻ¤'āĻ¤ā§āĻ āĻā§āĻ¨ā§ āĻ
āĻĄāĻŋāĻ
'āĻŦā§āĻ āĻ
āĻ¨āĻ˛āĻžāĻāĻ¨ āĻŦāĻž āĻ
āĻĢāĻ˛āĻžāĻāĻ¨āĻ¤ āĻļā§āĻ¨āĻŋāĻŦāĻ˛ā§ āĻ¸ā§āĻŦāĻŋāĻ§āĻž āĻĻāĻŋāĻ¯āĻŧā§āĨ¤
āĻ˛ā§āĻĒāĻāĻĒ āĻā§°ā§ āĻāĻŽā§āĻĒāĻŋāĻāĻāĻžā§°
āĻāĻĒā§āĻ¨āĻŋ āĻāĻŽā§āĻĒāĻŋāĻāĻāĻžā§°ā§° ā§ąā§āĻŦ āĻŦā§āĻ°āĻžāĻāĻāĻžā§° āĻŦā§āĻ¯ā§ąāĻšāĻžā§° āĻā§°āĻŋ Google PlayāĻ¤ āĻāĻŋāĻ¨āĻž āĻ
āĻĄāĻŋāĻ
'āĻŦā§āĻāĻ¸āĻŽā§āĻš āĻļā§āĻ¨āĻŋāĻŦ āĻĒāĻžā§°ā§āĨ¤
āĻ-ā§°ā§āĻĄāĻžā§° āĻā§°ā§ āĻ
āĻ¨ā§āĻ¯ āĻĄāĻŋāĻāĻžāĻāĻ
Kobo eReadersā§° āĻĻā§°ā§ āĻ-āĻāĻŋā§āĻžāĻāĻšā§ā§° āĻĄāĻŋāĻāĻžāĻāĻāĻ¸āĻŽā§āĻšāĻ¤ āĻĒā§āĻŋāĻŦāĻ˛ā§, āĻāĻĒā§āĻ¨āĻŋ āĻāĻāĻž āĻĢāĻžāĻāĻ˛ āĻĄāĻžāĻāĻ¨āĻ˛âāĻĄ āĻā§°āĻŋ āĻ¸ā§āĻāĻā§ āĻāĻĒā§āĻ¨āĻžā§° āĻĄāĻŋāĻāĻžāĻāĻāĻ˛ā§ āĻ¸ā§āĻĨāĻžāĻ¨āĻžāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§°āĻŖ āĻā§°āĻŋāĻŦ āĻ˛āĻžāĻāĻŋāĻŦāĨ¤ āĻ¸āĻŽā§°ā§āĻĨāĻŋāĻ¤ āĻ-ā§°āĻŋāĻĄāĻžā§°āĻ˛ā§ āĻĢāĻžāĻāĻ˛āĻā§ āĻā§āĻ¨ā§āĻā§ āĻ¸ā§āĻĨāĻžāĻ¨āĻžāĻ¨ā§āĻ¤ā§° āĻā§°āĻŋāĻŦ āĻāĻžāĻ¨āĻŋāĻŦāĻ˛ā§ āĻ¸āĻšāĻžāĻ¯āĻŧ āĻā§āĻ¨ā§āĻĻā§ā§°āĻ¤ āĻĨāĻāĻž āĻ¸āĻŦāĻŋāĻļā§āĻˇ āĻ¨āĻŋā§°ā§āĻĻā§āĻļāĻžā§ąāĻ˛ā§ āĻāĻžāĻāĻāĨ¤
