Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-dialectical Perspective
07.2016β―Π³. Β· Routledge
ΠΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ½Π½Π° ΠΊΠ½ΠΈΠ³Π°
252
Π‘ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠΈ
family_home
ΠΡΠ³ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡΠ°
info
reportΠΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ·ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅ Π½Π΅ ΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈ Β ΠΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΅
ΠΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΎ Π·Π° ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈ Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ½Π½Π° ΠΊΠ½ΠΈΠ³Π°
This volume gives a theoretical account of the problem of analyzing and evaluating argumentative discourse. After placing argumentation in a communicative perspective, and then discussing the fallacies that occur when certain rules of communication are violated, the authors offer an alternative to both the linguistically-inspired descriptive and logically-inspired normative approaches to argumentation.
The authors characterize argumentation as a complex speech act in a critical discussion aimed at resolving a difference of opinion. The various stages of a critical discussion are outlined, and the communicative and interactional aspects of the speech acts performed in resolving a simple or complex dispute are discussed. After dealing with crucial aspects of analysis and linking the evaluation of argumentative discourse to the analysis, the authors identify the fallacies that can occur at various stages of discussion. Their general aim is to elucidate their own pragma- dialectical perspective on the analysis and evaluation of argumentative discourse, bringing together pragmatic insight concerning speech acts and dialectical insight concerning critical discussion.
The authors characterize argumentation as a complex speech act in a critical discussion aimed at resolving a difference of opinion. The various stages of a critical discussion are outlined, and the communicative and interactional aspects of the speech acts performed in resolving a simple or complex dispute are discussed. After dealing with crucial aspects of analysis and linking the evaluation of argumentative discourse to the analysis, the authors identify the fallacies that can occur at various stages of discussion. Their general aim is to elucidate their own pragma- dialectical perspective on the analysis and evaluation of argumentative discourse, bringing together pragmatic insight concerning speech acts and dialectical insight concerning critical discussion.
ΠΠ° Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΠ°
Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst
ΠΡΠ΅Π½Π΅ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈ Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ½Π½Π° ΠΊΠ½ΠΈΠ³Π°
ΠΠ°ΠΆΠ΅ΡΠ΅ Π½ΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠ²ΠΎ ΠΌΠΈΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅.
ΠΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡ Π·Π° ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½Π΅ΡΠΎ
Π‘ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π±Π»Π΅ΡΠΈ
ΠΠ½ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ°ΠΉΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΡΠΎ Google Play ΠΠ½ΠΈΠ³ΠΈ Π·Π° Android ΠΈ iPad/iPhone. Π’ΠΎ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΈΠ½Ρ
ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ° Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ»Π° Π²ΠΈ ΠΈ Π²ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ²Π° Π΄Π° ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ½Π»Π°ΠΉΠ½ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ»Π°ΠΉΠ½, ΠΊΡΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΎ ΠΈ Π΄Π° ΡΡΠ΅.
ΠΠ°ΠΏΡΠΎΠΏΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠΈ
ΠΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΠ΅ Π΄Π° ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ Π·Π°ΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΎΡ Google Play Π°ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ½ΠΈΠ³ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ΅Π± Π±ΡΠ°ΡΠ·ΡΡΠ° Π½Π° ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΡΠ° ΡΠΈ.
ΠΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈ ΠΈ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈ ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΡΠ²Π°
ΠΠ° Π΄Π° ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ Π½Π° ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΡΠ²Π° Ρ Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎ, ΠΊΠ°ΡΠΎ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡ Kobo, ΡΡΡΠ±Π²Π° Π΄Π° ΠΈΠ·ΡΠ΅Π³Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΉΠ» ΠΈ Π΄Π° Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠ΅Ρ
Π²ΡΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ Π½Π° ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎ ΡΠΈ. ΠΠ·ΠΏΡΠ»Π½Π΅ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ Π² ΠΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΡ, Π·Π° Π΄Π° ΠΏΡΠ΅Ρ
Π²ΡΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΉΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΅ Π² ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄ΡΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈ.
